Delhi-based advocate Vivek Garg has reportedly approached Delhi Police seeking an FIR against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, alleging that his remarks could incite members of the armed forces and police against the government.
Complaint Seeks Criminal Action
A complaint has reportedly been filed with Delhi Police by advocate Vivek Garg, seeking criminal action against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee over remarks allegedly made during an interview. The complaint calls for an investigation into statements that Garg claims could have serious implications for public order and national security.
The allegations have brought renewed attention to the legal and political debate surrounding online commentary, freedom of expression and the limits of speech.
Multiple BNS Provisions Cited
According to reports, the complaint invokes multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including those concerning alleged conspiracy and conduct described by the complainant as sedition-related.
The complainant has reportedly alleged that Rathee’s remarks could encourage members of the Army and police to act against the elected government. These claims, however, remain allegations made in the complaint and have not been established by a court.
Complaint Does Not Automatically Mean an FIR
Filing a complaint seeking an FIR is not the same as confirmation that an FIR has been registered. Police must examine the complaint and determine what action, if any, is warranted under the law. The available reports do not establish that Rathee has been convicted of any offence in connection with these allegations.
Arrest Rumours Separately Dismissed
Reports circulating online about Rathee’s alleged arrest by Noida Police have also been dismissed by Noida Police as false and misleading. That clarification concerns the arrest rumours and does not, by itself, determine the status or merits of the complaint filed in Delhi.
Legal Process to Determine the Allegations
The matter has sparked discussion about the balance between freedom of expression and the legal consequences of statements alleged to threaten public order or encourage unlawful conduct.
For now, the complaint represents the complainant’s allegations not a judicial finding of guilt. The next steps depend on the police response and any further legal proceedings.