A viral video featuring the younger brother of late Punjabi singer Sidhu Moosewala has sparked a controversy after he was seen making a gun-like gesture during a concert in Toronto, Canada. The incident has drawn attention on social media, with a child rights organisation raising concerns about the toddler’s exposure to such gestures.
What Happened at the Toronto Concert?
The incident reportedly took place on October 9, 2026, during the opening concert of Sidhu Moosewala’s Signed to God hologram world tour in Toronto. His younger brother, Sukhdeep Singh Sidhu, popularly known among fans as Chhota Sidhu, appeared on stage and performed his late brother’s signature ‘thaapi’ gesture.
However, a video showing the child making a gun-like hand gesture and mimicking firing also circulated online. The clip subsequently attracted widespread attention and triggered a debate about the influence of public appearances on young children.
Child Rights Organisation Files Complaint
According to media reports, Lawyers for Human Rights International (LFHRI) submitted a complaint on October 17 to authorities in Punjab’s Mansa district. The organisation reportedly raised concerns regarding the child’s welfare and the circumstances in which the gestures were made during the public appearance.
The complaint sought an inquiry into the matter and reportedly called for parental counselling and appropriate directions to prevent the child from being encouraged to imitate gun-firing gestures during public appearances.
What Is the Family’s Response?
Reports published on October 18 stated that the family’s lawyer had not received official communication regarding the complaint at that time. No final finding establishing wrongdoing by the parents had been reported in the coverage reviewed.
Why Is the Video Facing Criticism?
The controversy has opened a wider discussion about children’s exposure to violent gestures, especially during public performances watched by large audiences online.
While the video has generated strong reactions, the complaint itself does not establish that any offence has occurred. The matter should be understood as a child welfare concern raised by an organisation, rather than a proven allegation against the family.