“Using ‘Bas**rd in heated argument does not amount to obscenity”, rules Supreme Court

Saying Bas**rd not obscenity: The Supreme Court of India, in a landmark ruling on criminal jurisprudence, has held that hurling abuses such as ‘bas**rd’ during an altercation does not constitute obscenity under Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). A bench comprising Justice PS Narasimha and Justice Manoj Misra noted that for an offence under Section 294 to be made out, the words must carry a clear sexual or prurient element. They added that mere vulgarity, or abuse, is insufficient. 

Representative image
Representative image

The court underscored that such expressions are often used in modern-day arguments and do not necessarily arouse sexual interest. It then set aside the conviction of the accused in the case.

Court overturns conviction in property dispute

The court made the ruling while hearing an appeal against a decision of the Madras High Court (HC), which had convicted two persons under Section 294(b) IPC. The case stemmed from a family dispute over a shared property boundary. An altercation broke out when a man attempted to fence the land, during which the accused allegedly hurled the contentious term at him, leading to their conviction for obscenity. 

The accused contended before the court that the offence was wrongly applied, while the State argued that the abusive language attracted legal provisions. The bench trashed the state’s stance, ruling that the word in question lacked any sexual undertone and therefore, could not be classified as obscene. 

Supreme Court
Supreme Court

What constitutes obscenity? Apex Court sheds light

The court clarified that the term’ obscene’ is not explicitly defined in the IPC. However, it drew guidance from Section 292, which links obscenity with content that appeals to prurient interest. The bench then referred to the Apporva Arora vs State, reiterating that obscenity pertains to material capable of arousing sexual or lustful thoughts, not language that merely offends or shocks. 

Holding that distasteful and uncivil expressions do not meet the legal threshold, the bench remarked, “Vulgarity and profanities do not per se amount to obscenity.” 

With the ruling, the Apex Court firmly concluded that the provision was not attracted in the present case, providing relief to the accused while setting a precedent for similar disputes in the future.

Also read: MP HC upholds woman’s right to reside with partner amid dispute with husband, junks spouse’s plea

Rohan Umak

A seasoned journalist and senior sub-editor, bringing in a wealth of experience in crime correspondence, judicial reporting, civic issues and off-beat stories . Born with the knack to craft good news stories. Worked previously with esteemed organisations like Dainik Bhaskar (English, Digital) and the Free Press Journal.

Related Posts

Amid lack of textbooks, CBSE orders immediate rollout of third language for Class 6; schools given 7-day deadline

CBSE third language rule: The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) on Thursday mandated the immediate introduction of a third language for Class 6 students from the academic year 2026-27, instructing all affiliated schools to comply within seven days. The move comes amid the absence of prescribed textbooks.  In a circular issued on April 9, the board directed the schools to treat the directive as ‘urgent and mandatory,’…

Read more

Continue reading
Dhurandhar 2’s OTT release likely by mid-May; Delhi HC sends filmmakers to mediation amid song row

Dhurandhar 2 OTT release: The Delhi High Court (HC) on Thursday referred a high-profile copyright dispute involving the film, Dhurandhar 2, to mediation, paving the way for both parties to resolve the matter amicably. The legal tussle, which ensued between Trimurti Films and B62 Studios, is centred on the song Rang De Lal (Oye Oye), which has been alleged to be a remix of Oye Oye Tirchhi Topiwale…

Read more

Continue reading

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *