A fresh development has emerged in the high-profile Twisha Sharma death case after accused Giribala Singh's counsel, Advocate Inosh George Carlo, addressed the media for the first time. The lawyer rejected claims that the accused had refused to provide voice samples, saying his clients had cooperated with the investigation and that the court record reflects the actual sequence of events.

Court Order Cited as Key Evidence

According to Advocate Carlo, the court's order sheet clearly explains the proceedings related to the collection of voice samples. He said any interpretation of the incident should be based on the official court record rather than speculation. The defence maintained that the accused never declined to participate in the process.

Legal Concerns Over Transcript

The lawyer also raised questions about the transcript provided by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) during the voice sample exercise. He said the accused were asked to read from a prepared transcript, which led to certain legal concerns. According to the defence, the accused wanted to seek legal advice before proceeding, but were not given sufficient time to do so.

'Three Hours of Cooperation'

Advocate Carlo further claimed that despite these concerns, Giribala Singh cooperated with the investigating agency for nearly three hours during the voice sample process. He said this demonstrated the accused's willingness to assist the investigation rather than obstruct it.

Investigation Continues

The Twisha Sharma death case remains under investigation, with the CBI continuing to examine all available evidence. The latest statement from the defence adds a new dimension to the ongoing legal proceedings. Investigators are expected to continue collecting evidence as the case moves forward, while both the prosecution and the defence are likely to present their respective arguments in court in the coming hearings.